Congruence
I have to say that I don’t like the “tradition” of - when asked - not telling people your political orientation and financial situation. It’s too Victorian in values for my liking. I reckon one’s political stance is very much centred around what one values, and what one values is very much a part of who you have decided to become based upon your past.
This encompasses the view that we all have a few values which shape all our decisions, and ultimately our lives. Although these may change as our experience changes, ultimately there are always strong attachments to these concepts which we adhere to as our personality. These are difficult to know, however, yet this does not mean that they do not exist. If they did not exist, what would the consequence be? An ever shifting personality… as new experiences come our way that we naturally adapt to them. Interestingly, this does not mean that we would have no personality whatsoever.
The not telling of your political stance is very much a cover-up, a façade… How can one decide to hide from one’s beliefs and values in the eyes of the public, if it is in fact beliefs and values that shape your actions? If they don’t shape your actions, then what does… Your façade based upon what you believe the public expect?
To create concepts means that we generalise; generalising means that we wrap something up to make it simple; making something simpler than it is means we reject all the information available; rejecting the entirety of the information means that we become ignorant.
By conceptualising public opinion (in order to create your façade), surely you fall into ignorance because everyone has different ways of looking at things. One step, therefore, to avoid falling into ignorance is to know what you believe, why you believe it and to act on it.
I suppose some might call it “being yourself.”












